Statuses squeak" returned to the air - as Website

After quarreled with Facebook and removed from the network, popular brand is back, this time as a separate web site - but still take the materials from Facebook. So how H"sttosim squeak "The new, and whether he has a chance to restore the glory of his predecessor?

Quietly, without water or declaration and contrast-to-noise was around closing "status squeak", the network increased its revised version. Site "status squeak - Voices from the network" Facebook Platform disconnected time, but he still draws its content from there, and unauthorized users.

"Statuses squeak" starting a Facebook page that aims to share posts on various topics from across society, and thus created a kind of virtual agenda. Last month, following the Globes magazine's investigation that revealed the economic behavior of the page Posts by promoting marketing fee, the page has been removed by the management Faisb market. Facebook also announced that the page will never return activity , because violated the site's policy regarding the conduct of marketing. Even the private accounts of Top managers, committees father Len-Len bentov, were blocked . Len fought internet around the decision, but to no avail. Now, he seems to be making a comeback - this time without the constraints of Facebook.

So now the site free of the harsh rules of Facebook, on the other hand - he still uses material published by users on Facebook, and even provides links to the source. Clicking on the name of the user who posted the post will meet the "status squeak", clicking on the image only increase it. If you want to find the source, you will need to click on Hmokdtnt profile picture of the user. In fact, there is a hybrid of a free platform borrowed content - to go with and feel without.

So how exciting the new site? Hard to decide. Cataloged posts published in categories: kicking, video, hot, cute, relationships, funny, exciting, family, classic and Risfkt. And to tell the truth, there is something a little tedious seeing a funny picture on the site below that line of labels Msbirniim of "cute", "funny", "family". Also, some of the posts from - and that element that existed even Facebook version of "peeping" - copied and pasted as a picture on a colored background, which makes every quote cute and casual and formal creation framed, poster, which takes from post all its spontaneity.

Even granting straining every post title and post separately (what works on sites like 9gag which title is part of the joke or saying and often complements) adds a touch annoying website. Unclear posting method - some appear as text, some of them as a picture, some with a link and some not. And especially - the resort managers are still not healed their policy of limited credits, when the posts are taken surfers without a link to the source and no application for leave (some do not even know that what they have written appears on). Indeed, the rule is that what is defined facebook Public is public, but it still creates a sense of "viral but it stinks."

And what will really H"oiraliot "? Facebook incarnation of "peeping statuses" Entries were getting hundreds of thousands of likes. This new at a location still does not happen - probably because it is still fresh, and as mentioned before, or have not yet been made ​​public, and will take time to be able to gain back the amount of previous fans, if any. The question is whether the amount of followers such it at all possible: Beyond the loss of confidence of quite a few followers label after "Globes", there is also the isolation of "peeping" Facebook: in his previous life, he was part of a torch, an organic part of the world of Mark Zuckerberg and culture posts his. Now is a separate site. While it is possible to write comments, Facebook and share posts, but how many people actually bother to get out from Facebook, go to the site and then go back up? Is there any point at all replication of Facebook posts to another site, where they are cut off from the relationship? We'll see.